|
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Will this affect water and sewer?
No. City water and sewer services are paid for by user fees and will not be
affected by the tax cap.
2. What will happen if the city faces an emergency of some kind and
needs more money?
2. The tax cap can be overridden by a two-thirds vote of the Laconia City Council
(four out of the six councilors). Any legitimate emergency will certainly be able
to get a two-thirds vote.
3. Why are there two sections in the tax cap that talk about the
override ability of the council?
3. Section B was part of the original proposed amendment and allowed only two
exceptions to the tax cap: capital expenditures (expenses paid out on projects
with long-term benefits such as roads and buildings) and municipal bonds (the
expenses incurred by a city borrowing money for various projects). However, this
limitation was one of the problems Assistant Attorney General "Bud" Fitch had with
the language of the tax cap. To satisfy the State of NH, the "Override Provision" in
section A was added to allow for an override vote of two-thirds of City Council for
any budget item, thus bringing this proposed tax cap amendment into compliance with NH
state law.
4. Won't this tax cap suppress growth?
4. When companies and individuals look for a community to move to, they frequently look
at the tax burden they will have to shoulder. Communities with a high tax rate discourage
growth. Franklin, NH has had a tax cap for fifteen years, and they are experiencing
tremendous growth. Business growth means additional taxes for the community, too, which
could make it even easier to balance the city's budget.
5. Won't a tax cap mean that personnel will be laid off and
needed services will be cut?
5. This is one of the most frequent objections to a tax cap and is largely a baseless
"boogeyman." Franklin, NH has never laid off any city workers as a result of their
tax cap. Services have continued. Some projects have been delayed until more money was
available, however, this kind of budgeting is no different than that exercised by any
responsible homeowner who has to make decisions about priorities. Laconia's problem is
not that the city doesn't have enough money coming in; Laconia's problem is that the city's
leaders are spending too much.
|